<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: OpenMoko&#8217;s open source mobile phone an iPhone alternative?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ben.dechrau.com/2007/07/09/openmokos-open-source-mobile-phone-an-iphone-alternative/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ben.dechrau.com/2007/07/09/openmokos-open-source-mobile-phone-an-iphone-alternative</link>
	<description>Programmer, Property Tycoon, Media Mogul</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 16:18:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Open Source Links: 11-07-2007 &#124; Commercial Open Source Software</title>
		<link>http://ben.dechrau.com/2007/07/09/openmokos-open-source-mobile-phone-an-iphone-alternative/comment-page-1#comment-28196</link>
		<dc:creator>Open Source Links: 11-07-2007 &#124; Commercial Open Source Software</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 12:04:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://benbalbo.com/2007/07/09/openmokos-open-source-mobile-phone-an-iphone-alternative/#comment-28196</guid>
		<description>[...] OpenMokoâ€™s open source mobile phone an iPhone alternative? - Ben Balbo writes about OpenMoko Neo 1973, just released to the public. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] OpenMokoâ€™s open source mobile phone an iPhone alternative? &#8211; Ben Balbo writes about OpenMoko Neo 1973, just released to the public. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aliasd</title>
		<link>http://ben.dechrau.com/2007/07/09/openmokos-open-source-mobile-phone-an-iphone-alternative/comment-page-1#comment-11742</link>
		<dc:creator>aliasd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2007 14:11:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://benbalbo.com/2007/07/09/openmokos-open-source-mobile-phone-an-iphone-alternative/#comment-11742</guid>
		<description>I wish my Vodafone supplied firmware had bugzilla :( In other news, I like the OM 7 &quot;neo&quot; video.... Don&#039;t really know why....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wish my Vodafone supplied firmware had bugzilla <img src='http://ben.dechrau.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' />  In other news, I like the OM 7 &#8220;neo&#8221; video&#8230;. Don&#8217;t really know why&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Balbo</title>
		<link>http://ben.dechrau.com/2007/07/09/openmokos-open-source-mobile-phone-an-iphone-alternative/comment-page-1#comment-7660</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Balbo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2007 11:40:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://benbalbo.com/2007/07/09/openmokos-open-source-mobile-phone-an-iphone-alternative/#comment-7660</guid>
		<description>So you&#039;re annoyed, in this instance, at me using the term &quot;iPhone alternative&quot;, when you (almost) agree it&#039;s correctly used in this context? Not to mention I didn&#039;t call it one - I questioned whether it was a valid assumption in the title.

As for feeling guilty for taking easy shots - shoot away. I enjoy the challenge and opportunity to flex my cognitive muscles!

Oh, and you&#039;re still a fanboy! ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So you&#8217;re annoyed, in this instance, at me using the term &#8220;iPhone alternative&#8221;, when you (almost) agree it&#8217;s correctly used in this context? Not to mention I didn&#8217;t call it one &#8211; I questioned whether it was a valid assumption in the title.</p>
<p>As for feeling guilty for taking easy shots &#8211; shoot away. I enjoy the challenge and opportunity to flex my cognitive muscles!</p>
<p>Oh, and you&#8217;re still a fanboy! <img src='http://ben.dechrau.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tobes</title>
		<link>http://ben.dechrau.com/2007/07/09/openmokos-open-source-mobile-phone-an-iphone-alternative/comment-page-1#comment-7658</link>
		<dc:creator>Tobes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2007 09:23:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://benbalbo.com/2007/07/09/openmokos-open-source-mobile-phone-an-iphone-alternative/#comment-7658</guid>
		<description>Sometimes its so easy I almost feel guilty. 

To be honest I&#039;m getting alittle annoyed at people using the term &quot;iphone alternative&quot; to every smartphone that comes on the market. ( or says it is coming on the market, at some point, in the future, maybe. ) Especially if you cant actually even fullfill the &quot;phone&quot; part of the equation.

It is nice though to see that this one at least has a touch screen which is better than alot of other phones being touted.

And for the record I think the iphone itself could seriously use some feature upgrades such as MMS.

&quot;Vapourware - Any product that has been announced but hasnt actually seen the light of day.&quot; - Tobes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sometimes its so easy I almost feel guilty. </p>
<p>To be honest I&#8217;m getting alittle annoyed at people using the term &#8220;iphone alternative&#8221; to every smartphone that comes on the market. ( or says it is coming on the market, at some point, in the future, maybe. ) Especially if you cant actually even fullfill the &#8220;phone&#8221; part of the equation.</p>
<p>It is nice though to see that this one at least has a touch screen which is better than alot of other phones being touted.</p>
<p>And for the record I think the iphone itself could seriously use some feature upgrades such as MMS.</p>
<p>&#8220;Vapourware &#8211; Any product that has been announced but hasnt actually seen the light of day.&#8221; &#8211; Tobes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Balbo</title>
		<link>http://ben.dechrau.com/2007/07/09/openmokos-open-source-mobile-phone-an-iphone-alternative/comment-page-1#comment-7634</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Balbo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2007 00:10:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://benbalbo.com/2007/07/09/openmokos-open-source-mobile-phone-an-iphone-alternative/#comment-7634</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sure how having a alpha release equates to it being vapourware. From Wikipedia: &quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vapourware&quot; title=&quot;Wikipedia: Vaporware&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Vaporware&lt;/a&gt; is a software or hardware product which is announced by a developer well in advance of release, but which then fails to emerge&quot;. This product fails to meet that description by the fact it has been released and is available to purchase.

You might have made that call based on the fact that the device cannot currently be used to its full extent immediately, and the GTA02 might never materialise, but the same could be said for any new piece of software on &lt;a href=&quot;http://sf.net/&quot; title=&quot;SourceForge&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;SourceForge&lt;/a&gt; in aplha status. The software is under development and is not suitable for use in a production environment. It is not, however, vapourware.

As for it&#039;s aesthetics, it&#039;s not as slick as the iPhone, and has a somewhat baby-toy look, but then again, I doubt it had the amount of money spent on it that the Apples of this world can afford to plough in to product design.

I&#039;m not sure that it will gain a huge consumer following in the short term, not only because they won&#039;t have the marketing budget, but also because it doesn&#039;t have the style that the materialistic consumers of today demand. In the medium- to long-term, it has a chance of gaining traction once developers produce third-party additions that will make this more flexible and supportive than other phones.

Consider the iPhone again - the only way you can add applications at present is by writing widgets (small, self-contained web pages). You can only write helper applications - nothing that can actually interact with the phone other than through a set number of API calls. Other phones are similar, only allowing you to run Java applets with the same limitations. The Neo1973 allows you to install any application written in C that uses the open X windows system and GTK toolkit, which gives you much more control and opens up the market to a more diverse range of applications.

True, most of the last paragraph will only mean anything to developers and hackers, but the results of that openness will positively impact future generations of 1973 owners, whether technically aware or not.

It annoys me that people can just disregard a new device on the market based on looks, but I realise your comment is probably an off-the-cuff remark from an Apple fanboy ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure how having a alpha release equates to it being vapourware. From Wikipedia: &#8220;<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vapourware" title="Wikipedia: Vaporware" rel="nofollow">Vaporware</a> is a software or hardware product which is announced by a developer well in advance of release, but which then fails to emerge&#8221;. This product fails to meet that description by the fact it has been released and is available to purchase.</p>
<p>You might have made that call based on the fact that the device cannot currently be used to its full extent immediately, and the GTA02 might never materialise, but the same could be said for any new piece of software on <a href="http://sf.net/" title="SourceForge" rel="nofollow">SourceForge</a> in aplha status. The software is under development and is not suitable for use in a production environment. It is not, however, vapourware.</p>
<p>As for it&#8217;s aesthetics, it&#8217;s not as slick as the iPhone, and has a somewhat baby-toy look, but then again, I doubt it had the amount of money spent on it that the Apples of this world can afford to plough in to product design.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure that it will gain a huge consumer following in the short term, not only because they won&#8217;t have the marketing budget, but also because it doesn&#8217;t have the style that the materialistic consumers of today demand. In the medium- to long-term, it has a chance of gaining traction once developers produce third-party additions that will make this more flexible and supportive than other phones.</p>
<p>Consider the iPhone again &#8211; the only way you can add applications at present is by writing widgets (small, self-contained web pages). You can only write helper applications &#8211; nothing that can actually interact with the phone other than through a set number of API calls. Other phones are similar, only allowing you to run Java applets with the same limitations. The Neo1973 allows you to install any application written in C that uses the open X windows system and GTK toolkit, which gives you much more control and opens up the market to a more diverse range of applications.</p>
<p>True, most of the last paragraph will only mean anything to developers and hackers, but the results of that openness will positively impact future generations of 1973 owners, whether technically aware or not.</p>
<p>It annoys me that people can just disregard a new device on the market based on looks, but I realise your comment is probably an off-the-cuff remark from an Apple fanboy <img src='http://ben.dechrau.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tobes</title>
		<link>http://ben.dechrau.com/2007/07/09/openmokos-open-source-mobile-phone-an-iphone-alternative/comment-page-1#comment-7592</link>
		<dc:creator>Tobes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2007 10:42:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://benbalbo.com/2007/07/09/openmokos-open-source-mobile-phone-an-iphone-alternative/#comment-7592</guid>
		<description>â€œCurrently it is not suitable for users. The state of the software at the moment is pre-alpha. If you order a Neo1973, DO NOT expect to be able to use it as an everyday phone for several months.â€ ---- Vapourware.


Ugly Vapourware at that :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>â€œCurrently it is not suitable for users. The state of the software at the moment is pre-alpha. If you order a Neo1973, DO NOT expect to be able to use it as an everyday phone for several months.â€ &#8212;- Vapourware.</p>
<p>Ugly Vapourware at that <img src='http://ben.dechrau.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
